sbacpo
Member
I spent a couple decades on active duty, most of it onboard submarines. I never served with anyone who had the title Chief Engineer. What exactly did you do onboard subs?I keep mine well past your numbers. I spent a career operating, maintaining, and repairing nuclear subs to include a tour as Chief Engineer of one. Lubricating oil analysis was a routine part of the life of machinery, that's how we get them out to the lifetimes the Navy does. My Suburban went 30 years on Mobil One and then AmsOil. In my accounting it is cheaper to take sample than to do oil changes. I let the sample results tell me when to change the lubricants. Interestingly I changed out axles and transfer case oils and the front axle OEM fill just looked unsat, so I'm glad I did that. An example: Last summer I did a speed run of 1,000 miles a day over a four day period. On completing it I did a sample and the oil was still in good condition. In my case the developing sample results seem to tell me that Boron additive and TBN are the drivers of engine oil condition. I'm investigating whether to add specific elements to the engine oil when predicted depletion occurs. We'll see. I expect those additives to be much less costly than a full up oil change. So thinking about it.
As for the topic at hand, it's like everything else with our trucks, it's just a matter of personal preference. You may not see the need to do X, Y or Z but what exactly is the point of criticizing those that do? Especially when your opinion wasn't requested.
Sponsored