amschind
Well-known member
I'm always heavily divided on car reliability reports because of my deep-seated cynicism toward the complexity in modern vehicles. I am a huge believer in the quote by Antoine de St. Exupery, "Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." Complexity decreases reliability: we spend reliability to gain features, but we must remember that it is a purchase. A parallel hybrid spends a great deal of reliability for the sake of efficiency, and it will be replaced by the series hybrid for that reason: the same features cost less reliability in a series hybrid.
I don't have ventilated seats, seat massagers, power folding mirrors, or the Ford 177 speaker Garfunkel and Fjordson audio system for that reason. I am actively fighting a war to the death against the exhaust heat exchanger. I don't know where the air dam, the factory spare tire pulley system, or the factory jack are today. These are 150-300k mile issues, and they are the things which can, in aggregate or by killing some vital system (heat exchanger I am looking at you) require replacement of the truck before my goal. Car and Driver is looking at the issues which will arise for the average driver over 3-6 years. For that reason, C&D's analysis is almost orthogonal to mine: they aren't wrong, they just have a completely different time horizon than I do. I think that's an important point to consider, both in this thread and others: sometimes we don't disagree, we are just answering different questions.
I don't have ventilated seats, seat massagers, power folding mirrors, or the Ford 177 speaker Garfunkel and Fjordson audio system for that reason. I am actively fighting a war to the death against the exhaust heat exchanger. I don't know where the air dam, the factory spare tire pulley system, or the factory jack are today. These are 150-300k mile issues, and they are the things which can, in aggregate or by killing some vital system (heat exchanger I am looking at you) require replacement of the truck before my goal. Car and Driver is looking at the issues which will arise for the average driver over 3-6 years. For that reason, C&D's analysis is almost orthogonal to mine: they aren't wrong, they just have a completely different time horizon than I do. I think that's an important point to consider, both in this thread and others: sometimes we don't disagree, we are just answering different questions.
Sponsored