TexasTruck
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #1
I've been reading a lot around the physics behind rotational mass. Primarily as it relates to tire and wheel weight and the effect it has on getting a vehicle moving.
I'm running 305/55R20 General Grabbers ATx tires that weigh ~65 lbs. each. When I first mounted them on my truck, I noticed a difference right away with the effort it took to get the truck moving. Not terrible, but enough to notice my "normal" take-off/acceleration RPM is higher now.
I'm having trouble with the Generals (Roush tire/wheel take-offs) and have been looking at alternative tires. I've had good luck with Nittos and looked up the similar sized tire. Nitto offers a load range 116Q and 122Q in their 305/55/R20 Ridge Grappler. What caught my attention is the 116Q weighs 51 lbs. vs 63 respectively.
The common theme is for every 1 lbs. of rotational weight it's basically equivalent of reducing anywhere from 5-10 lbs. of static weight. With that in mind you can calculate that ~120-150 lbs. of static weight can mean a 15-20 BHP gain.
Will reducing the weight of each tire by 10+ lbs. make that much difference in getting the truck moving?
Reading material:
https://www.cjponyparts.com/resources/sprung-vs-unsprung-weight
https://www.w8ji.com/rotating_mass_acceleration.htm
https://www.tirebuyer.com/education/impact-of-wheel-weight
http://hpwizard.com/rotational-inertia.html
https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a15130598/upsized-wheels-tires/
TIA
I'm running 305/55R20 General Grabbers ATx tires that weigh ~65 lbs. each. When I first mounted them on my truck, I noticed a difference right away with the effort it took to get the truck moving. Not terrible, but enough to notice my "normal" take-off/acceleration RPM is higher now.
I'm having trouble with the Generals (Roush tire/wheel take-offs) and have been looking at alternative tires. I've had good luck with Nittos and looked up the similar sized tire. Nitto offers a load range 116Q and 122Q in their 305/55/R20 Ridge Grappler. What caught my attention is the 116Q weighs 51 lbs. vs 63 respectively.
The common theme is for every 1 lbs. of rotational weight it's basically equivalent of reducing anywhere from 5-10 lbs. of static weight. With that in mind you can calculate that ~120-150 lbs. of static weight can mean a 15-20 BHP gain.
Will reducing the weight of each tire by 10+ lbs. make that much difference in getting the truck moving?
Reading material:
https://www.cjponyparts.com/resources/sprung-vs-unsprung-weight
https://www.w8ji.com/rotating_mass_acceleration.htm
https://www.tirebuyer.com/education/impact-of-wheel-weight
http://hpwizard.com/rotational-inertia.html
https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a15130598/upsized-wheels-tires/
TIA
Sponsored
Last edited: