HammaMan
Well-known member
That's a completely different thing. The 'glare free' was good ~12 years ago. The vid I posted above is 8 years old. The issue is the low beam cutoff is wrong under these conditions and needs to be modified. The driver should at the very least be able to give the vehicle a proper level. The 'self leveling' doesn't work as intended right now which is the issue. So close, yet, so far. There shouldn't even be a manual adjust up front, it should be done on the IPC as the current setup can't fully discriminate a proper cutoff.I thought that is the concept behind the Ford glare free. I agree such things should be included in USA vehicles. At least if you get OEM LED lights it should be included because they seem to be the most blinding on the roads.
Having a Canadian truck with glare free enabled by default it is neat to watch the lights dim on the left side for oncoming traffic then kick back up to full bright after cars pass.
Ti is showing promise w/ their DLP light engines. I mean they're trying to get companies to put them into the puddle lamps as well as advanced huds and widescreen windshield augmented reality -- dive into the rabbit hole here https://www.ti.com/dlp-chip/automotive/overview.html
Audi's implementation is okay, but it's still dazzling drivers but can be modified by telling the algo to be less aggressive as well as speeding up the retreat. Whereas ford's glare-free has 3 positions, audi's has dozens of positions. Starts at a demo of its widely dynamic blackout capability.
Sponsored