HammaMan
Well-known member
I think you're mixing up hubs / axles.If the hub had tapered roller bearing, Wouldn't that make it fully floated?
But yeah, Without tapered bearings, Axial loads are taken up by the pressed in spline
Sponsored
I think you're mixing up hubs / axles.If the hub had tapered roller bearing, Wouldn't that make it fully floated?
But yeah, Without tapered bearings, Axial loads are taken up by the pressed in spline
Could you explain? Think there is some confusion somewhere.I think you're mixing up hubs / axles.
I'd love to see that but typically the interim remedy has been done under recall or warranty and the dealer retains the removed hub assembly and axle shaft (so no opportunity for the customer to take it and delve into the thing).On another note, Anyone wants to send me their old bearing, I'll autopsy that for the forum.
3/4 float is a lower cost design with the bearings closer together in a finished non-serviceable assembly, and the axle shaft provides some mass carrying capacity for moment loads as the bearing arrangement isn't sufficient enough on its own to counteract such forces in this application. Full floating preloads the bearings whose configuration is more analogous to a non-driven spindle. In lighter duty applications a 3/4 like arrangement would be sufficient on its own and is a common wheel hub configuration.Could you explain? Think there is some confusion somewhere.
Do you think that the PB's regenerative braking, which may result in more frequent and forceful reversal of the torque-load on the splines than most non-hybrid user's impose with their driving habits, may offer a clue in this?Seemed to have showed up in the PBs first which suggests torque being a factor ....
Other than the assumption that Ford is using tapered roller bearings in the hub
I've been suspecting they're hoping that they replace enough of them long enough for it to 'no longer be a problem'. Their recalls are hurting the bottom line.Ford's first letter said that they thought they would have a resolution 4th quarter 2024. Then a later letter pushed the time line back to sometime in 1st quarter 2025 (which we're still in). Even then, there is nothing binding to hold them to that - they could push the timing back again.
I can't say that that line of thinking has never entered my mind....I've been suspecting they're hoping that they replace enough of them long enough for it to 'no longer be a problem'. Their recalls are hurting the bottom line.
Yeah, that aspect of the situation is a bit of a puzzlerNot sure how they were both able to continue to ship new trucks not part of the recall AND yet somehow not have a fix? That's not adding up.